Why do we always speak of “necessary reforms” face of globalization?
By , 0 viewsQuestions Asked by ABC : Why does it always speaks of “necessary reforms” face of globalization? Coincidentally, these “necessary reforms”, they are always social regression.While the secu, paid holidays, the SMIC, the decrease of working time, retirement at 60, etc., all these social advances have been made over time in an environment as competitive as ours. And also contributes to our wealth.Because it is not to say, but if we work more, it reduces the purchasing power, benefits, can also be aligned with Bangladesh.Instead of aligning the top, putting the package on Education, Research, innovation, new modes of organization. That is our strength, not trying to match China.Me, I do not envy them, “small” Chinese: 70 hours, lousy pension, no paid vacation. Is Happy!To all liberals and conservatives flaps joy, I said, this is not a policy of social regression that will improve the application Best answer:
not leveling down
What do you think? Answer below
6 Comments
December 7th, 2010 at 12:29 am
Ba but yes it is. When competing companies based in France have a shot of clearly inferior to theirs, are not 36 solutions to these companies if they want to survive: they are in France or conditions allowing them to fight, or they relocate.It’s ugly but it’s like that, and until there is no greater rights for workers in countries emerging here will not change.If you do not envy the Chinese, they will fight for rights, it will be most useful for them and for us.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[Reply]
December 7th, 2010 at 12:54 am
Always the same refrain, to believe that when the responsibility, they DID NOT shaking??
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[Reply]
December 7th, 2010 at 1:31 am
I remember the speech by Giscard in 77, already “continue efforts” … He took the example of a swimmer who perceiving the coast but a voice whispered in his ear “stop to swim, you rest.”That’s right, always striving for the lowest. I read this morning on the train an article on eco alter the progressive tax. And this bin detox back much further than 77!Simple as that. They com and marketing with them and, again, sheep elected the butcher.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[Reply]
December 7th, 2010 at 1:36 am
Politicians mostly straight talk about the necessary reforms because they do not live in the same world as us. These reforms are needed to contribute to the enrichment of those already rich. They talk about the necessary reforms, some of them are likely, but should not we address in a first-time abuse of the CAC40 companies and their leaders agree that the golden parachutes hallucinating, while workers toil, and must do more and more concessions?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[Reply]
December 7th, 2010 at 1:52 am
You’re right, do not touch anything and mostly leave the generations to Sort this out with the debt swells visibly.It is as if the fishermen said, while fish stocks are endangered:”We do not want to know anything, we want to continue fishing as before … “
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[Reply]
December 7th, 2010 at 2:04 am
One way to make us spend large suppositories
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
[Reply]